Ok, so Amitabh Bacchan just made an announcement about global warming, and its good that this cause has, "reached" India. This is of course crucial, as India, one of the top three developing nations, with a mammoth population, is one of those nations that would soon join the consumerist ecological imbalance causing nation. The countries, on the threshold of development are the ones where changes in big measure can be taken place. For one, the citizens are in the process of aquiring the wasteful habits, as opposed to their developed counterparts, who have lived that lifestyle for some time now. This means that, they are more likely to be able to devise a lifestyle that is more informed. Another, is of course, the population of India. its the second largest in terms of population and so, its crucial that measures to develop a more informed and concsious lifestyle are taken here. As India joining the bandwagon would mean that there are probably twice as many people involved in environmental degradation as ever before. Indians know that the law and order situation is rather non stringent here, though with development, thats changing for the good. (and to think people consistenyl just hate on capitalism, blindly condemning it, while benefitting from the goodies and jobs it throws in there kitties).
Anyways, why would the title of this write be celebrities and causes, if all I am talking about is global warming and India? I will tell you. Three odd years back, just as six odd years back, global warming was still happening, though not the kind of subject that would get anyone any footage or attention. I remember trying to send out fliers online to my friends, requesting them to join the cause, and i got nothing but disinterest and apathy. Apart from a few celebs, prominantly Leonardo di Caprio, there werent any interested in voicing concern about it. Come on, these people are your idols right? But forget vision, they dont even have common sense to figure out that our reckless behaviour will cost us, and that with the useless media coverage they get for changing their hair colour, they could probably raise awareness about that? No, they supported cancer then. Some because they had seen its horrors in close terms, others simply because by then it became a well publisized cause. You see, the people whose every word you hang on, are nothing but working actors or musicians, or Paris Hiltons, meaning jobless famous people. It doesnt make them lesser, but the fact is that most of them are probably there, not because they should be, but because they can fool naive people in to making them reach there.
Yet, even if for trivial things like media bytes to cover their inconsequential life, if these people bring attention to something that should get a voice, I will always prefer that it happen than not. I would not take Sheryl Crow or for that matter anybody else's advice on these matter ( as remember there are professionals to give you those. An environmentalist will obviously know more than a singer, about environment. And would you rather that a dancer at your club design your house than an architect? till of course they possesed a gift for it and experiance in it.)
But they give the cause the media bytes. And media a better job than to hound celebrities or make mess out of trivial issues and try to act director instead of media. For this, I would rather that this happen. For the sad reality is that, most people will not listen to a cause till it isnt endorsed by someone famous. I dont get it? Most of these things are visible to common sense. Why would you trust someone's rambling over your minds voice? Or maybe, not everyones mind is focussed on living life completely. Ironic, yet possible.
But today, as i read the article about Amitabh Bachhan, the man people call God here in India, for reasons best known to them, and his voicing concern on global warming, my dad just chuckled and said, " they finally found another cause. All the scientists do the hardwork and these people take the credit and limelight." Its true. And its absurd. Of course, we assume that if its a celebrity voicing concern, the cause might be legitimate. As you know, there are many cheats out here, who find charity the easiest way to raise money. But the fact is that, in that search for legit, we are ignoring the true movers and shakers. In this world, where heroes are made by the media ( a sad degradation from the days when they were made so by their actions), its crucial that people start finding the hero within themselves. Also, I know that while there might be a possibility that there could actually be a stupid entity called masses, that basically just seem to crowd the planet, the fact is that most humans have a sense of discernment and basic intelligence. Which means that they probably might actually become cynical about these causes if they see another stupid celebrity dancing to the tunes of a new charity thats getting all attention. Many of you, have probably distastefully thrown an article about some celeb and his advice on GB or AIDS or any other thing for that matter. Or just laughed and ignored it. And that probably is a right thing to do.
But my advice would be simple. Forget the people raising this concern. The ones who truly care, are doing this because they wouldnt be able to sleep without sending out this message, and doing what they can. The people who take the action, the scientists, the researchers, the people who build this world, are the true heroes. It doesnt decrease the importance of the people who bring attention to this, and definitely not the media. But they hold a position thats theirs. Ultimately, it gives them very little credit for what they are doing, putting these celebrities on the pedestal they should be on. Also, a major part of the "attention" campaign is done by the media.
Lastly, if all this is too complicated, forget the junk and do what your common sense tells you is right. We are all a part of this planet and what kind of people would we be, if we didnt live our lives aware and determined. Whoever gets the credit, however wrongfully, the fact remains that there will be some the toil and work and others that bask in light. But only those who follow their heart and mind, will set this world in right.
Adios.
Wednesday, May 9, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
4 comments:
I am sure evey celebrity statement and endrosements on social issues
must have been prompted by efforts of sincere people though they won't admit. So don't stop sending out your mailers and flyers you never know what chain reaction they might cause eventually. Any sincere and heartfelt thought never goes waste without seeing the light of the day.
I genuinely believed CSE(Centre for science and environment) to be a champion of issues concerning environment and had plans to join them to contribute towards their efforts. But to my disappointemt after making a huge noise on the pesticide levels in coke and pepsi they went completely silent on the "Ram Sethu" issue. As an organisation that displays concern for the environment they should be spearheading the cause for halting the dredging as many marine life is in danger. Let them not comment on the issue whether a bridge exists or not but atleast let them raise their voice for the voiceless marine life that is in danger!!! Guess "Ram Sethu" is not renumerative and doesn't give much media mileage as Coke and pepsi :(
Was very disappointed that we dont have any credible orgainsation who can champion issues related to environment. Wht's more disheartening is the whole nation looks forward for a celebrity endrosement.
Guess it is upto the people to change. No use blaming the media for taking no social responsibility(very rarely they follow up on a news they break : what happened to the young engineer Dubey's story, it is out of media it is out of our mind as well!!!) and the celebrities who are lured into championing social issues for a status and career milestone. It is the insignificant us who can make the change happen.
I guess its the albatross around social organization's nec. the ram setu issue seems to be a lot more complicated than the marine lif and the fact is that in an age where information can be twisted out of recognition, it might be difficult for the org to tell truth from lies.
The one thing I believe in is being more responsible and aware. apart from that, it would be really difficult to do anything till one doesn't mae it the purpose of their existence. introspect on the inside, and just be more responsible citizens of this planet. otherwise, i find myself getting more cynical by the day, because the moment something becomes a hot topic, the wannabes join the bandwagon and ruin the true issue behind a movement.
i dont have much info about the CSE, and till they can reasonably state why they are doing what they are doing, i might support them. but apart from that, i am a bit wary of organizations and mascots. Its the issue that matters, and if we can even create the changes within, i guess the battle has been won.
"and if we can even create the changes within, i guess the battle has been won."
- I guess it is easier said than done. And as each day goes by i am getting more cynical. No news is free from manipulation and no one does anything with no hook attached to it.
"the ram setu issue seems to be a lot more complicated than the marine lif and the fact is that in an age where information can be twisted out of recognition, it might be difficult for the org to tell truth from lies."
I have enjoyed reading your posts on various issues. your style of view point and dissection of issues is very interesting. I would like to know your standpoint on "Ram Sethu".
Post a Comment